Comparison of two versions of Romeo and Juliet (Act 3 Scene 1) Essay Example For Students

Comparison of two versions of Romeo and Juliet (Act 3 Scene 1) Essay I am comparing the same scene (act three scene 1) from two different versions of the play Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare. The Zefferelli version which is set in Verona, Italy in the Tudor times and the Luhrman version which is set on Verona Beach, America from the present day. The clothing worn by the actors are very different in the two versions. In the Zefferelli version all the actors wore tights and Tudor clothing whereas in the Luhrman version the clothing is much more modern. The Montagues wear loud colourful shirts, jeans and are pretty laid back; the Capulets wore black suits, steel heel shoes and look like a mafia gang. The two different times that the versions were set are shown by certain things that happen in the play. Such as In the Luhrman version all the actors use guns whereas in the Zefferelli version all the actors use swords, all though the language is kept the same in both versions the weapons are called swords. The fight scene also shows differences in time such as in the Zefferelli version, when Romeo goes after Tybalt he chases him on foot whereas in the Luhrman version he chases him in a car. The fight starts by the Capulets arriving to were the Montagues are situated and asking to bare a word with one of them the exact words were Gentlemen, good den, a word with one of you this doesnt sound like a troublesome comment but these are the first words that lead to a fight.In the Zefferelli version the Capulets arrive on foot whereas in the Luhrman version they arrive in a flash car. Mercutio is the only one of the Montagues to answer, in the Zefferelli version he is bathing in a fountain whereas in the Luhrman version he is chilling on Verona beach. Both these tell the audience that the day is hot so the tension is high and a fight is more likely to break out. Both Mercutio and Tybalt are passing insults back and forth. In the Zefferelli version the humour is high and the surrounding people just keep laughing whereas in the Luhrman version its much more serious and no ones laughing. Then the killer blow is struck Tybalt says Mercutio, thou consortest with Romeo which means Mercutio is gay and he is sleeping with Romeo. In the Zefferelli version Mercutio just laughs it off, but is still angry whereas in the Luhrman version Mercutio gets very angry and the speech develops from speaking to shouting telling the audience that Mercutio didnt find it too funny. A fight is just about to start from this comment when Romeo arrives who is just the man Tybalt wants to see. Romeo enters the scene with happiness as he has just married Juliet and wants to tell all of his friends, but then he sees Tybalt, Juliets cousin and sort of calms down. All the time Romeo is talking to Tybalt he is dropping hints about how he has just married Juliet, such as The reason I have to love thee Doth much excuse the appertaining rage To such a greeting. Villain am I none; Therefore farewell, I see thou knowest me not. Romeo is sort of telling Tybalt that he is now family but he doesnt want to tell him up front because Tybalt hates him. Tybalt doesnt like the fact that Romeo doesnt want to fight. He tells him to turn and draw which is a saying often used in western films it means they both turn there backs, tack a certain amount of steps forward then turn and both shoot. In the Luhrman version he punches him, kicks him and much more until Romeo starts to bleed shouting at him to turn and draw whereas in the Zefferelli version Tybalts just tells him to turn and draw. .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 , .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .postImageUrl , .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 , .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709:hover , .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709:visited , .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709:active { border:0!important; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709:active , .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709 .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u76b1d96a447ec0d1c5a859d9b88e1709:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Shakespeare paper EssayRomeo still doesnt want to fight, after all their family now, although no one knows this apart from Romeo and the audience. This is called dramatic irony. This causes a much more tense audience as they cant wait to see what happens next. So instead of fighting Romeo tells Tybalt to be satisfied In the Luhrman version Romeo pulls out hes gun while saying this whereas in the Zefferelli version he just shakes Tybalts hand. In the Zefferelli version the humour is high and Tybalt puts hes hand in the water as if to say Romeo has germs and everyone laughs, when he takes hes hand out of the water he splashes Mercutio who is still bathing in the fountain, th is is were Mercutio decides to fight, after all, Romeo wont. Whereas in the Luhrman version Mercutio interferes in Romeos fight and fights for him. There is a sense of fair play in both versions. In the Luhrman version Mercutio drops his gun before fighting. In the Zefferelli version the sense of fair play is much higher. Tybalt has a few chances to kill Mercutio but doesnt as he is unarmed, when Tybalt has hes sword to Mercutios throat he just tells a joke and everyone laughs, they even shake hands while fighting. This shows that the humour is much higher too, in the Luhrman version there is no laughter at all as it is very serious. In the Luhrman version Mercutio is stabbed with a piece of glass, but it seemed like an accident as Tybalt was aiming for Romeo but Mercutio moved him out the way. In the Zefferelli version Tybalt looks shocked that he has stabbed Mercutio as if he didnt mean it, only Tybalt saw the blood on the end off the sword so everyone else just carries on laughing as if it didnt happen. Whereas in the Luhrman version everyone becomes worried about Mercutio, then Mercutio starts to laugh so the Montagues laugh with him as he says just a scratch, just a scratch. He also says tomorrow youll find me a grave man. The word grave has two meanings serious, and grave, as in gravestone. So he could be saying it as a joke or he could be saying tomorrow hell be dead. In the Zefferelli version the people carry on laughing at him even when he says to one of them to fetch him a servant. Before dropping to hes death he says a plague upon both your houses. They only stop laughing when he is officially announce d dead. In the Luhrman version when he says a plague upon both your houses a storm breaks out to show that something bad as happened. He then falls to his death. In both versions Romeo is now in fury with anger and wants to kill Tybalt, he doesnt even think about the fact that he is now hes cousin. In the Zefferelli version he chases after him on foot whereas in the Luhrman version a car chase breaks out. When they meet the sense of fair play goes out of the window Romeo just wants to kill Tybalt. In the Luhrman version the two cars crash and Tybalts gun falls out, they then fight for the gun, in the end Romeo gets the Gun and shoots Tybalt repeatedly. Whereas in the Zefferelli version they both draw their swords and they fight, at one stage in the fight Romeo loses hes sword. Usually the fight would stop due to fair play not this time other people even try to stop the person getting the sword back to Romeo. Then Tybalt loses hes sword and they have a scruff on the floor then Tybalt gets hes sword back and is just about to kill Romeo when Romeo picks up a sword and stabs Tybalt in the heart. Romeo then realises what he has done and says I am fortunes fool and runs off. .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 , .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .postImageUrl , .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 , .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701:hover , .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701:visited , .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701:active { border:0!important; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701:active , .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701 .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7b55b5f3a3f94d9ffdfb3e546950c701:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: When Shakespeare was alive going to the theatre was a lot different than it is now EssayWhen the police arrive on the scene all is tearful for Romeos parents and Tybalts too. But in the end the prince has had enough of these public brawls and banishes Romeo. We still watch Romeo and Juliet even though it was written so many years ago, this is because the moral of the film is that gang wars are bad, the world would be a better place without wars.

to kill a mockingbird Essay Paper Example For Students

to kill a mockingbird Essay Paper to kill a mockingbirdTo Kill A MockingbirdTo Kill A Mockingbird is a great book written by Harper Lee. This book is aboutTom Robinson trying to help a white girl named Mayella. All that Tom was tryingto do was help that little white girl out, but he was alone with her. Bob EwellMayellas father said that Tom raped his daughter Mayella. He was just walkingby and got asked to help a girl out so he did because he felt sorry for her. Those were three things leading to Tom Robinsons conviction. The first cause was the prejudice ness of the south in the 1930s. One exampleof this is the churches were segregated. Calpernia motioned Jem and ma to theend of the row and placed herself between us.(120) Though the conjugation waskind to the children they were surprised of the children. Alexandria wantedAtticus to be fired for being Toms attorney since Tom is black. The town wasoutraged that Atticus would do suck a thing. Atticus was helping Tom Robinsonso now everyone is mad at Atticus. Do you defend niggers Atticus?(74)Everyone wants Atticus to be fired for helping Tom. Atticus is just trying tohelp Tom now everyone is against him. A group of town members formed a mob andwent to the jail to lynch Tom. The mob that the town formed went to the jailand started things. The men jumped a little and scattered: because they werepeople everyday. (146) The towns mob went to the jail for Tom because ofwhat has been going on. The towns mob was angry that they went to the jail. We will write a custom essay on to kill a mockingbird Paper specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Bob Ewell and Mayella accused Tom of the crime. Bob was accountable for seeingTom raping Mayella. Judge Taylor asked Bob. Mr. Ewell did you see thedefendant having sexual intercourse with your daughter?(174) Bob said that hesaw his daughter getting raped by Tom Robinson. His own daughter Mayella alsoaccused Bob of being a drunk. Mayellas testimony says that Tom raped her alsogave the jury another white witness against Tom Robinson. Mayella told thejudge that her father was a decent, Except for when he was drunk.(183)Mayella said that Tom raped her so they believed her because she was a whiteyoung girl testifying against a black man. Another reason that they believedher is because that its Mayellas, and Bobs Ewells word that Tom raped her. No doctor had ever examined Mayella to see if she actually got raped at all. Did you call a doctor sheriff! Did anyone call a doctor? No ser said Mr. Tait. No body called a doctor because it was a black mans word against twowhite peoples word. The reason that they didnt call a doctor is that theydidnt rally care if he raped her or not its just that they want to put onemore black person in jail because of the color of his skin. Finally Tom was allowing himself to be alone with a white young woman because hefelt sorry for her so he wasnt thinking really. Tom had talked about stoppingand helping her. Did you ever go on the place again? Yes Suh When?Well I went lots of times.(191) The reason that Tom went over there was tohelp Mayella so that he could be a good guy. He was just trying to be a goodman all the work that Tom did he did it all for free out of the kindness of hisheart. Tom felt sorry for Mayella so he helped her every day after work. Yessuh. I felt sorry for her.(184) Thats why he went and helped her out inthe first place. So he felt good about it so he kept helping her for the hellof it. Tom helped Mayella break up big things that would be hard for her. Shealways had a little something for me to do chopping kindle, totin water forher. Every time he walked is she would have a new job for him to do for her. He always would always be pleased to help her. Tom Robinson had three main causes leading to the conviction. The towns peopleput a lynch mob together and were shocked of Atticuss actions for helping ablack man. Bob said that he saw sexual intercourse between Tom and Mayella sothe judge believed him but they didnt ever examine Mayella for rape. Thereasons that he stopped at all were that he felt sorry for her because Bob was adrunk. Mayella had told the judge that Bob was a drunk and he believed her. Tom had gotten put in jail for raping Mayella. I think that Friar Laurence was to a large extent responsible for thedeaths of Romeo and Juliet. However, several other factors contributedand we can not solely blame one person. The circumstances, time periodand characters need to be taken into consideration. The Friar is introduced half way through the play, and his role is avital one. In his first scene we see him with the poison, and thisscene links up with his last two scenes and the consequences of thatsame poison. His entrance breaks the pace of the previous balconyscene, and gives the audience time to absorb what has occurred betweenRomeo and Juliet. Juliet has an almost non-existent relationship with Capulet. FriarLaurence fills this void by portraying a ^father^ figure in Juliet^slife. She trusts him and confides in him regularly. ^Hold daughter. Ido spy a kind of hope^^ In addition the Friar is also Romeo^s confidentand tries to find solutions to their overwhelming problems. He also breaks the terrible news to Romeo about his banishment, and hetries to do so in a humane way. He comforts the distraught Romeo, andwhen potential danger lurks, offers him a shelter under the desk!Friar Laurence tries to dissuade Pairs from marrying Juliet. This couldbe selfish behavior on his part, as the Friar knows he would becommitting a sin if he married Juliet to Paris, when she was alreadymarried to Romeo. Another example of the Friar^s selfish intentions, is the tomb scene,whereupon finding Juliet in there, and two dead bodies lying on thefloor, he needs no persuasion to leave, which he does so in immensehaste!The following incident is an example of how the Friar contributed tothe deaths of the star-crossed lovers. He marries Romeo and Juliet,fully aware that they do not have their parents consent. He should haverefused to marry them or sought the advice of an older and moreexperienced member of the church. It was the Friar^s idea that Juliet swallows the remedy. This was avery rash decision, and, if thought out properly, he would haverealised the dire consequences and complications that could occur. Friar Laurence largely contributed to the deaths of Romeo and Juliet bymarrying them despite their ages, giving Juliet the poison and by notthinking things through clearly. Instead he always tried to find a^quick-fix^ solution. However, he has a kind disposition, and honestlytries to help Romeo and Juliet in whatever way he can. And, to give himhis due, he did confess his sins, and offer to sacrifice his life. Thisconfession, added to the tragic deaths of the young lovers, ceased theage-old fight between the Capulets and the Montagues. Reason Not ReligionObservations and inferneces from real life perceptions: My entire lifeI have been a Catholic and have attended Church regularly with myfamily, always believing in God and the stories and tales of the Bibleas pure fact that happened long ago, and of Jesus being the savior,etc. .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 , .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .postImageUrl , .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 , .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354:hover , .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354:visited , .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354:active { border:0!important; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354:active , .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354 .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ufa6349571e52e516e06e30090515b354:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Yes, Another The Pearl EssayJust this past month I attended a Presbyterian church service with myelderly grandmother in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. The church was small tobegin with, and only about one-third of the seats were filled. I wouldhave to say that at least 95% of the people were all over 65, with veryfew young couples at all. My grandma made a comment on the lack ofyoung people who attend the masses now, and she kept referring to thefact that recently less and less young couples and families everattended church. At first I thought that this church would then seriously have to closeits doors when the current majority of the parishioners died, but thenI realized another aspect of human behavior and psychology. The characteristic that I see and hear so much about that many humanstend to possess and practice, is the fact that they become closer togod the older they get. Why is this? It is because of one of thesame big reasons that we even have to have religion in the first place:fear about death and what happens to us afterwards. These people seemto be turning to the kind of thinking that inspired the dichotic ideaof PASCAL^S WAGER. Even if these people were not very religious duringtheir younger years, we can now see a trend of a large section of ourcountry^s population starting to attend church more and more and becomemore religious as they grow older. What inspires this shift?plainand simple, the fear of uncertainty. QUESTIONING ONES BELIEFS MUST GO BEYOND JUST WONDERINGWhen I used to attend Church regularly their was a priest who was an extremely good speaker and extremelyintelligent. Even though he was a Catholic priest, serving as the pastor of an extremely large church, he had thecourage and brains to disagree with some of the rigid dogma setup and enforced by the Vatican. I remember onesermon he gave that has greatly influenced me since, and I am very happy I was fortunate enough to hear it. Inthis certain sermon he talked about his thoughts on it being good for teenagers and youth to question theexistence of a God in their world. He talked at length about this questioning and finished up the speech with thesummation that even though we can question, it all comes back to God. I continued to believe in this way for a very long time. That there were many questions concerning the actual andtrue existence of God, however due to certain things like the design of the world, everything had to relate back toan almighty creator. Just recently I have started to realize the problem with my previous concept of questioning,as well as this particular priests. In the manner that he was referring to this concept, he was very right in the factthat everything has to come back to God. The reason that this is true is due to the fact that just questioning isexactly that: if all we do is say to ourselves, is Gee I wonder?, then we of course will not be able to come up withany alternative except to continue believing in the existence of a god. Questioning one^s faith must not only encompass asking yourself epistemological and metaphysical questions,but we must explore, learn, and above all gain knowledge about the evidence and the arguments from both sidesof the debate. We must have dialogues with others who believe the same as us, as well as those who share acompletely different, even blatantly contrary view. Only by these means can we ever come out with a greaterunderstanding of the issues surrounding the questions about the existence of a supreme being. If this procedureis followed and we always continue to learn and accept new, valid information then we will eventually find ourown sense of the truth, and our own philosophy for our lives. MY JOURNEY TO FIND THE TRUTH, AND SUBSEQUENT LEAP OF REASONThis past year I really started examining my own beliefs and faith in God. As I read Homer^s Iliad, informationabout Mithra (Jesus^ immediate mythological predecessor), and many other sources that put questions in my mindabout the validity of my faith, I began to seriously doubt whether God was something just made up by humanssince the beginning of time to explain their world, or was really the truth. I am sure now in my mind that the images and symbols used to represent God and initially gods, werecontrived simply to explain phenomena of the planet, mysteries of life, and to satisfy that extremely strong need ofhuman beings to feel important. This past point I feel is the most pivotal in understanding the human race^smajority view of the existence of a supernatural power. There are so many people today that of course we can^t allhave jobs that most would consider important and help lead the holder of that job toSELF-ACTUALIZATION, so a god makes up for that. It is written and spoken by Christians and the Biblethat all human beings are equal and that they are all loved the same by God, therefore everyone is extremelyimportant because the maker of us all values them on par with everyone else. A respected businessman whohas worked for his fortune is the same as a neurotic drug addict begging for money; often times the former is seeneven as more evil. THE FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF A GOD In my quest to find the truth about the existence of a God, which will always be going on and never end, I havealso made it a point to study those arguments which are many philosophers^ and theists^ base for their belief in analmighty creator. I will begin by explaining the thought that goes into each argument, and how the people whomare proponents of these such arguments validate their claims. I will then therefore proceed to point out themistakes that I believe each of them makes, some more than others. These three main arguments are as follows:Teleological Argument for the Existence of GodThe teleological argument for the existence of God is one that uses the actual existents we know in reality, in thiscase the entire planet and universe, and uses these in a somewhat well developed theory for the existence of agod. The simplest way to define this argument is to use the simple analogy of a clock maker to a clock; or intelligentdesigner to an intelligent design. This is the conscious basis for a theory that states that due to the fact that welive and exist in a wholly technical and advanced-level world where things such as the existence of life andhumans are very intelligent, then there must be an intelligent creator that first shaped us all and everythingaround us. This theory has been changed and developed even more over the years into modern versions. The main ideas that I find inherently wrong with this argument come from the fact that first: theists believe thatGod just exists and always has, however he too would be an intelligent being, and according to the teleologicalargument itself, would He then not necessitate an intelligent designer? And so on and so forth^ Thereforetheists who believe in the existence exists idea in terms of a God, and also tend to endorse the teleologicalargument, are contradicting themselves because of a conflict in which the premises of their two parallel beliefs areat odds. Those making this contradiction must check their premises. Another more abstract theory that can act to somewhat disprove the validity of this argument is that of theOSCIALLATING UNIVERSE THEORY. This theory in a nutshell states that the universe is constantly eitherexpanding or condensing, as long as matter is present in the universe. A corollary of this theory also says thatthere is substantial evidence that the universe has expanded to its limit and then shrunken down again into onepoint of infinite density, temperature, and curvature, only to explode again (the big bang), a total of 100 times!With the potential of an entirely new universe being created each time this has happened, with the potential ofcompletely different laws of physics and the behavior of matter, then there is definitely the increased possibility ofour planet simply existing and being able to support life by a chance creation of the universe we live in, created bythe current expansion and creation that has been happening for an estimated 10 billion years. The fact is, with thatmany worlds being created over time, there is a sure chance that out of all those planets created, at least one, ours,could support life. .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 , .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .postImageUrl , .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 , .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07:hover , .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07:visited , .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07:active { border:0!important; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07:active , .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07 .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u79ab217430265e709bf672f531013f07:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The New York City Ballet EssayThe Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The Ontological argument for the existence of a God is more complex, and more utterly unfounded then the one,previous argument that we have examined. This argument basis its entire proof on floating abstractions madeabout the brain of man, his conscious, and the things it is unable to do. This argument is commonly referred to St. Anselm, its primary creator. The argument goes like this: We all have somewhat of an image or idea of what Godis in our minds, even atheists who don^t believe in any god still have somewhat of a conception of what agod, if one existed, would have to be like and capable of. Our conception of a God is fairly limited because toconceive of a being so great and powerful is hard for us to do in the first place. Anselm holds that because we cantherefore conceive nothing greater than God, one must exist. Let^s look at that in simplistic form: due to the fact that I can neither think nor conceive of anything greater thanthis entity, the particular entity which I can not go beyond therefore must exist. How absurd of an argument isthis? Its only foundation lies on some unconnected idea of a philosopher, randomly applied to reality. The mainproblem that I have with this argument is that it takes a rule and law of reality and reason, and applies tosomething that we simply can have no conclusion ever made on while living on earth. If I say that there is nothingworse and more scary that I can conceive of beyond death, so therefore death must exist, I am right because deathdoes exist. In this case the ontological argument for the existence of death works. How do I know itworks?because I can see and perceive death in reality and I can know it beginning with my sense perceptions. The existence of, and my knowledge of death, is hierarchical. However the concept of God can^t not be tracedback to basic sense perceptions (where all concepts must be originally derived from), and is therefore unable to begrounded in reality and truth. In order to gain higher knowledge of something as complex as a God, we fist mustperceive basic facts of reality. There are no basic facts of reality to perceive when it comes to the concept ofGod. Think of any concrete that almost all men believe in and their can be no real intellectual debate about without oneof the parties being totally irrational in even disputing the fact^that concrete concept can be traced back to thetraced down on through the line directly to man^s ability to perceive. God^this concept can not be brokendown into anything close to reality and perception. It is because of this fact that even if you do believe in God,in order to retain any sense of being able to think, you must remain agnostic. If we refuse to recognize the fact thatthe existence of God is impossible to perceive, then human knowledge will perish into an abyss of unconnectedand unsupported beliefs in irrational and ungrounded faiths, which we will fool ourselves into believing is reality. The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The Cosmological argument hinges on a property which is a corollary of the axiom of existence. This law is the lawof causality^which states that all things that occur do so because they are caused. The proponents of thisargument then take this law, which we apply to every day reality on Earth, to the beginning of the universe. Theysay that the universe just couldn^t have existed for all time, but that it would have to had been created just likeeverything else. They then take these beliefs even farther when they assert that the process of creation andexistence can not be infinite in either moving forward, or looking backward. For instance, these people believe that God created the universe^therefore the universe has a cause. Howeverthey do begin to get into contradictory waters as soon as they are confronted with the fact that they believe oftheir God^s existence^was God created too? No^they say that there has to be some beginning that just was andalways will be^there can be no infinity in either going forward, and no infinite progression backwards throughages of cause after cause. This first contradiction is plain and obvious to the educated interpreter of the argument,the others are more deeply involved with other problems. If these people believe in the phrase existence exists when it comes to their God, then why can^t this just beapplied to something such as the universe? Why do we need a fanciful God to explain the beginning of theuniverse when the cosmological argument already asserts that things can not simply progress or regressinfinitely? The reason is due to the concepts we discussed earlier of the need of human self-actualization andthe reassurance of an afterlife where we can finally fully enjoy our humanity and existence. This argument is right in one respect: the very entity that initially created the universe itself was not caused orcreated. In this correctness however they fail by failing to correctly identify that thing which did create theuniverse^it was not God, but something which contained the entire universe and still is a part of that universe. (FOR A CLARIFICATION OF WHAT I AM REFERRING TO HERE, READ THIS.)FINAL CONCLUSIONSMy final conclusions so far in my quest to understand the basis for beliefs and proof for the existence andnon-existence of God are short, small, and completely unfinished. They are my final conclusions for this paper,at this point in my life. One^s true final conclusions on these matters will only be able to made some day if there issome place, perhaps not necessarily a heaven, where we will have time to think and reflect on what we havelearned during our lives, and perhaps even after them. For now I know that no matter what paths we follow as human beings on journey to cognitive understandingabout God, we must always remain agnostic for the complete duration of our mortal lives, primarily because ofthe lack of a hierarchy of knowledge which we can see and deduct for the concept of God. Finally, we must alllearn as much as we possibly can and can volitionally motivate ourselves to in order to understand this debateand conflict in human belief. To kill a mockingbird Essay Paper Example For Students To kill a mockingbird Essay Paper To Kill A MockingbirdIn the novel, To Kill A Mockingbird, a character Atticus states; Courage is when you know youre licked before you begin, but you begin anyway and see it through no matter what. Throughout history, there have been many courageous people who have strongly demonstrated the quality of courage. Courage is a reoccurring theme that Harper Lee chooses to emphasize throughout To Kill A Mockingbird that many of her characters pursue as a strong quality. However, courage is proven to be most evident through Atticus, Scout, and Calpurina. Atticus is truly a man of courage. Throughout, To Kill A Mockingbird he has to face many situations where a courageous decision is needed in order to help someone very important. Although there are many characters that are against Atticus decisions, he still tries to see them through knowing that the odds of succeeding are weak. Atticus definitely defines courage when he makes the decision to represent a Negro named Tom Robinson, in court. Unfortunately, many people in the town of Maycomb are prejudice and look down upon Atticus for choosing to do so. However, Atticus knowing how strongly people feel about his decision for defending a black man feels that it is something he must do. A quote from the novel symbolizing his courage is found where Jem and Scout are asking Atticus why he is defending Tom Robinson: Every lawyer gets at least one case in his lifetime that affects him personally. This ones mine I guess. This quote represents his courage because it shows that he has a respons ibility and is going to do the best job he can even when he understands that the odds are against him. Atticus also displays courage when he tells Scout that you shouldnt judge someone until you have been in his or her shoes. A quote showing this is found where Scout explains to Atticus about her days misfortunes at school and how Miss Caroline tells her that she was taught the wrong way by her father: First of all, Scout if you can learn a simple trick, youll get along a lot better with all kinds of folks. You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view. This quote further explains his courageous qualities because it shows that he doesnt believe in judging others until you have been in their skin, or until you know a person. It takes courage to understand the concept of getting to know another persons point of view before judging them. Atticus shows this through his courageous decision to defend Tom Robinson. The towns people judge Tom Robinson , however Atticus sees through them and chooses to see his side, which truly displays his courage. We will write a custom essay on To kill a mockingbird Paper specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Scout, displays her courage throughout the story as well. She is a mature seven-year-old girl, and shows her courage in many situations where she stands up for what she believes in even though many disagree with her. Scout demonstrates her courageous quality when she punches Francis because he calls Atticus a nigger lover. A quote resembling this scene, is found where her and Francis are having an argument over Atticus: Francis looked at me carefully, concluded I had been sufficiently subdued, and crooned softly, nigger lover. Thus time I split my knuckle to the bone of his front teeth. This quote further symbolizes Scouts courage because it shows how much she really cares for her father. Although violence is not the key to resolving anything, it was very courageous of Scout to punch Francis because she really stood up for her father. Scout was very hurt from Francis words and her punching him displayed how much she truly loves Atticus and how she wouldnt want his feelings to be hurt in any way. Scout also displays courage when she makes her way through the crowd of men, dressed in overalls, who are about to hurt Atticus. She tries to stall them from hurting him by talking with Mr. Cunningham. A quote that represents her courage demonstrated in this scene is found when Scout is trying to look amongst the crowd for a familiar face: They were sullen looking, sleepy-eyed looking men who seemed unused

French Number Expressions - Confusing Pairs

French Number Expressions - Confusing Pairs There are several confusing pairs and difficult expressions related to French numbers. Floor System Differences The numbering system of the floors in a building may be difficult for American English speakers.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  American English  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  British English Rez-de-chaussà ©e  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  First floor  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ground floor Premier à ©tage  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Second floor  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  First floor Deuxià ¨me à ©tage  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Third floor  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Second floor The meaning of premier changes depending on the preposition that precedes it. Au premier  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  At/On the first Au premier à ©tage  Ã‚  On the second floor  Ã‚  On the first floor En premier  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The first in a sequence En premier lieu  Ã‚  Ã‚  In the first place, Firstly De premier/premià ¨re (prix, qualità ©)  The top (prize) or best (quality) Two Words for the Same Number in French There are two French words for the English ordinal number second (2nd): second  and deuxià ¨me. They are essentially interchangeable, but there is a general, not always followed guideline: Second  is often used when something is the second in a series of only two things. Deuxià ¨me tends to be used when theres a third, fourth, etc. Following this guideline allows you to add some interesting nuances to your words. La seconde guerre mondiale  Ã‚  World War II (the second and last) La deuxià ¨me guerre mondiale  Ã‚  World War II (the second of how many?) There are two words for third and fourth - one for the ordinal number and another for the fraction troisià ¨me  Ã‚   third (in a series) un tiers  Ã‚  Ã‚   one third quatrià ¨me  Ã‚  fourth (in a series) un quart  Ã‚   one fourth

The Founding of Thebes

The Founding of Thebes The founder of Thebes is known as Cadmus or Kadmos. He was a descendant of the union of Io and Zeus in bull shape. Cadmus father was a Phoenician king named Agenor and his mother was named Telephassa or Telephone. Cadmus had two brothers, one named Thasos, and the other Cilix, who became king of Cilicia. They had a sister named Europa, who was also carried off by a bullZeus, again. The Search for Europa Cadmus, Thasos, and their mother went to look for Europa and stopped in Thrace where Cadmus met his future bride Harmonia. Taking Harmonia with them, they then went to the oracle at Delphi for a consultation. The Delphic Oracle told Cadmus to look for a cow with a lunar sign on either side, to follow where the cow went, and to make sacrifices and establish a town where the bull lay down. Cadmus was also to destroy the guard of Ares. Boeotia and Ares' Dragon After finding the cow, Cadmus followed it to Boeotia, a name based on the Greek word for cow. Where it lay down, Cadmus made sacrifices and started to settle. His people needed water, so he sent out scouts, but they failed to return because they had been killed by Ares dragon who guarded the fountain. It was up to Cadmus to slay the dragon, so with divine assistance, Cadmus slew the dragon using a stone, or perhaps a hunting spear. Cadmus Founds Thebes Athena, who helped with the slaying, advised Cadmus that he should plant the teeth of the dragon. Cadmus, with or without Athenas help, sowed the teeth-seeds. From them emerged fully armed warriors of Ares who would have turned on Cadmus had Cadmus not thrown stones at them making it appear that they were attacking one another. Ares men then fought with each other until only 5 worn out warriors survived, who came to be known as Spartoi the sown men who then helped Cadmus found Thebes. Thebes was the name of the settlement. Harmonia was a daughter of Ares and Aphrodite. The conflict between Ares and Cadmus was resolved by the marriage of Cadmus and Ares daughter. The event was attended by all the gods. Offspring of Cadmus and Harmonia Among the children of Harmonia and Cadmus was Semele, who was the mother of Dionysus, and Agave, mother of Pentheus. When Zeus destroyed Semele and inserted the embryonic Dionysus in his thigh, the palace of Harmonia and Cadmus burned. So Cadmus and Harmonia left and traveled to Illyria (which they also founded) first handing over the kingship of Thebes to their son Polydorus, father of Labdacus, father of Laius, father of Oedipus. Founding Legends Athena reserved some of the dragons teeth to give to Jason.Thebes was an Egyptian city, too. One story of the founding of Thebes says that Cadmus gave the Greek city the same name his father had just given to the Egyptian city.Instead of Polydorus, Pentheus is sometimes named as the successor of Cadmus.Cadmus is credited with bringing the alphabet/writing to Greece.The continent of Europe was named for Europa, the sister of Cadmus. This is the background for the first of three sets of stories from Greek mythology about Thebes. The other two are the sets of stories surrounding the House of Laius, especially Oedipus and those around the conception of Dionysus. One of the more enduring figures in the Theban legends is the long-lived, transgendering Tiresias the seer. Source Ovids Narcissus (Met. 3.339-510): Echoes of Oedipus, by Ingo Gildenhard and Andrew Zissos; The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 121, No. 1 (Spring, 2000), pp. 129-147/

Workplace Crime and Honest Dealing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Workplace Crime and Honest Dealing - Essay Example Staff dishonesty is a crime committed against companies and does not solely consist of theft. Matthew Liew asserts that "crime encompasses exposures to loss from the dishonest acts of people within or outside the company." This may involve money or property of the company. Staff dishonesty could also include other types of misbehaviors such as "rule-breaking, destructive practices, non-cooperative practices, disruptive practices and misuse of facilities" (Challinger 2). One of the most common forms of staff dishonesty is theft. "Employee theft from a retail store is a term that is used when an employee steals merchandise, food, cash, or supplies while on the job" (McGoey). Theft can also be in the form of misusing employee discounts, offering discounted prices to friends, and cheating by reporting incorrect number of hours of work (Adjudicative Desk Reference). It can be assumed that this type of crime can be more damaging to retail companies because the involved persons are part of the organization, are usually trusted, and should be well-informed about the crime prevention measures that the company is adopting (McGoey). Matthew Liew adds that staff dishonesty can be detrimental to the company, especially since it may take a long time before it can be detected. Although employee theft is... Several authors believe that around 50% to 60% of employees in retail companies are guilty of dishonest conduct (Adjudicative Desk Reference). Studies conducted also indicate that staff dishonesty can equate to thousands of dollars in losses. Dennis Challinger notes that employee theft or pilferage, as opposed to other workplace crimes, is easy to measure, translating to around 1.8% of the gross national product in Britain and $40 billion a year in the United States, causing the failure of around 20% of companies in the U.S. (2). According to Kevin Philip, "staff dishonesty could account for up to 60 per cent of business losses" (9). In a separate survey by the University of Florida in 2002, employee theft accounted for disappearance of around 48% of store inventories, translating to $1.5 billion per year. The same survey found that compared to shoplifting, employee theft equated to an average loss of $1,341.02 for each case of theft, while for every shoplifting incident, average dol lar loss was only $207 (McGoey). What is obvious in several studies conducted on the prevalence of workplace dishonesty is that some of those who committed such offense are managers or those in authority. It was reported that in Britain, 8% of managers have been involved in workplace crime (Challinger 3). In a study conducted by Kevin Philip, it was found that dishonest employees in supermarkets include managers, head cashiers, front-end supervisors, cahiers, floor staff and store men. In a study that involved 1,408 retail employees in the Minneapolis area, 60% of those surveyed admitted to having committed an illegal activity, with 57% having been involved in misusing employee discount, while 12% admitted having taken a merchandise without paying for it (Adjudicative

Unit 6 Seminar Public Health Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Unit 6 Seminar Public Health - Essay Example In addition, barrier protections have been a routine part of all health care institutions in reducing the spread of disease. Riegelman (2010) define immunization as the introduction of antibodies/vaccine to strengthen the immune system and to prevent or control diseases (102). Immunizations are essential to the protection of the public because it prevent infection from bacterial and viral diseases, provide either short/long-term immunity, may effectively control outbreak, and can control 70-90% of substantial population with infections from contagious viruses. On the other hand, a number of disadvantages were also noted, among of which are: some diseases such as HIV/AIDS may not have effective vaccines, immunizations are rarely 100% effective particularly among the young and the old and can produce side effects such as allergic reactions, live vaccines may cause injury to fetus or diseases to those with reduced immunity, and immunizations through inactivated vaccine may not produce long-term immunity and thus requires follow-up vaccines/boosters. Barrier protections also include isolation and quarantine. Isolation refers to the separation of the individuals with diseases from healthy population in order to prevent exposure (Riegelman, 2010, 102). Isolation and quarantine have the advantage of controlling the spread of a number of infections and serve as the basic strategies for controlling communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis. However, isolation and quarantine may possibly break confidentiality of contacts’ information due to identification of individuals with diseases and follow-up of contacts. It may also lead to public recognition and social stigma placed upon affected individuals. Barrier protections such as immunizations, isolation, and quarantine encompass treatment of those with disease and their contacts and are all essential comprehensive

Analysis Of Scientific c Essay Example for Free

Analysis Of Scientific c Essay The first step in the scientific method is to perform some background research and in the news article (â€Å"Engineers Create New,† 2008). It is implied that this step had been followed because it mentions that other researchers have already made several studies and experiments and have been doing it for several years. It is obvious that the scientists in the current study have performed a background analysis of previous efforts to develop other adhesives. The second step is the formulation of the hypothesis and in this particular news, the hypothesis is whether it is possible to formulate an adhesive that emulates the capability of the hairs on the toes of the gecko lizard that are able to clean themselves without having to use water or chemicals. This would be an interesting result because normally, dirt would stick to an adhesive and it would lose its stickiness in the process. Fearing explains that the ultimate goal is to develop an all-terrain robot that can emulate the gecko lizard that could walk on dirty surfaces along walls and ceilings (â€Å"Engineers Create New,† 2008). The next step in the scientific method is to conduct several experiments to test the hypothesis and the news article provides a rough sketch of the experiments that the engineers had conducted, where they use microfibers made from stiff polymers to represent the toe hairs and microspheres with diameters ranging from three to 10 microns to simulate dirt (â€Å"Engineers Create New,† 2008). After the experiments, an analysis of the results was made, and it was mentioned that it was indeed possible for the microfibers to get rid of some of the dirt after every simulated step of a gecko lizard. As a conclusion, it is indicated that it is possible to make an adhesive that cleans itself but further studies have to be made with other kinds of surfaces because in these experiments, only glass was used. Looking at the scientific soundness of the news article, we can see that there is no mention of the sample size, which is quite common in such kinds of articles. As we can see, this article is lacking in this respect but it could be assumed that this is mentioned in the actual report made by the scientists. As for the control group, there is no specific mention of the researchers actually performing an experiment where common adhesive materials are used instead of the microfibers being studied. The news report is also lacking in this respect but it could have been assumed that it is the common knowledge of the reader that with the usual adhesive, dirt accumulates until it is no longer sticky. In the study, the independent variables are the range of the sizes of the microspheres and the characteristics of the glass surface and the microfibers. The dependent variable is the quantity of microspheres that get deposited on the glass surface every time the simulated step of a gecko is performed on it. Another dependent variable is the adhesion strength of the new adhesive material after several steps have been done. There would be some suspicion of bias in the part of the researchers if a particular result would serve to benefit them. Taken in this light, almost everyone could be suspected of bias but in this study, the scientists are scholars who appear to be genuine in their desires to create something useful for humanity. References University of California Berkeley (2008, September 10). Engineers Create New Gecko-like Adhesive That Shakes Off Dirt. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://www. sciencedaily. com/releases/2008/09/080910090610. htm